A4-9120C vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
39.73
+7257%
A4-9120C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.54

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms A4-9120C by a whopping 7257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking652841
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.56no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency13.438.52
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date25 November 2019 (5 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads642
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate8 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier3716
L1 cache96K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache128 MBno data
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Number of transistors19,200 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4BGA
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/s14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 39.73
+7257%
A4-9120C 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 63115
+7325%
A4-9120C 850

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.73 0.54
Recency 25 November 2019 6 January 2019
Physical cores 32 2
Threads 64 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has a 7257.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

A4-9120C, on the other hand, has 4566.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120C in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop processor while A4-9120C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 347 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 77 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3970X or A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.