Xeon Platinum 8260 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Xeon Platinum 8260 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon Platinum 8260 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 301 | 307 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.45 | 6.00 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Power efficiency | 7.32 | 10.95 |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| Release date | 2 October 2018 (6 years ago) | 11 December 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,299 | $4,702 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has 8% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8260.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon Platinum 8260 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 30 | 24 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 35.75 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon Platinum 8260 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | Socket TR4 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon Platinum 8260. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon Platinum 8260 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon Platinum 8260 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon Platinum 8260. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 93.867 GB/s | 140.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon Platinum 8260.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.34 | 19.10 |
| Recency | 2 October 2018 | 11 December 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 165 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon Platinum 8260, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 51.5% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon Platinum 8260.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8260 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon Platinum 8260, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
