Ryzen Threadripper 2900X vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 300 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.48 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.28 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 2 October 2018 (6 years ago) | August 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,299 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 32768 KB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | 9600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket TR4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 93.867 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 24 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 125 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has 200% more physical cores, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen Threadripper 2900X, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
