Xeon Silver 4108 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.33
+185%
Xeon Silver 4108
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
5.72

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon Silver 4108 by a whopping 185% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon Silver 4108 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4151138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.996.00
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency8.436.25
Architecture codenameZEN+ (2018−2019)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date6 August 2018 (6 years ago)11 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649$417

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 50% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4108.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon Silver 4108 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3518
L1 cache1.125 MB512 KB
L2 cache6 MB8 MB
L3 cache32 MB11 MB
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data77 °C
Number of transistors9600 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon Silver 4108 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSP3r2FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon Silver 4108. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon Silver 4108 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon Silver 4108 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon Silver 4108. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size2 TiB768 GB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon Silver 4108.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 16.33
+185%
Xeon Silver 4108 5.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25454
+186%
Xeon Silver 4108 8909

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 1280
+52.9%
Xeon Silver 4108 837

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 7374
+67.8%
Xeon Silver 4108 4394

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.33 5.72
Recency 6 August 2018 11 July 2017
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 85 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has a 185.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Silver 4108, on the other hand, has 111.8% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4108 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4108 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon Silver 4108, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Intel Xeon Silver 4108
Xeon Silver 4108

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 71 vote

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 16 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4108 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2920X or Xeon Silver 4108, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.