Xeon E5-2696 v4 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
15.97
+2%
Xeon E5-2696 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 150 Watt
15.65

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-2696 v4 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2696 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking424439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.60no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency8.409.87
Architecture codenameZEN+ (2018−2019)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date6 August 2018 (6 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2696 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads2444
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier3522
L1 cache1.125 MBno data
L2 cache6 MB5.5 MB
L3 cache32 MB55 MB
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2456.12 mm2
Number of transistors9600 Million7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2696 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSP3r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2696 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2696 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2696 v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2696 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiB1,536 GB
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2696 v4.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 15.97
+2%
Xeon E5-2696 v4 15.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25365
+2%
Xeon E5-2696 v4 24862

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 1277
+14%
Xeon E5-2696 v4 1120

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 7418
Xeon E5-2696 v4 9006
+21.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.97 15.65
Recency 6 August 2018 20 June 2016
Physical cores 12 22
Threads 24 44
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 150 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2696 v4, on the other hand, has 83.3% more physical cores and 83.3% more threads, and 20% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2696 v4.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2696 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon E5-2696 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
Xeon E5-2696 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 75 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 367 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2920X or Xeon E5-2696 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.