Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Xeon E5-2697A v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697A v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 145 Watt
14.11
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.63
+17.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-2697A v4 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking543413
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.739.11
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency8.878.42
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)ZEN+ (2018−2019)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)6 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,891$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 234% better value for money than Xeon E5-2697A v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2635
L1 cacheno data1.125 MB
L2 cache4 MB6 MB
L3 cache40 MB32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size456.12 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Million9600 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size1.5 TB2 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s93.867 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 14.11
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 16.63
+17.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 21587
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25454
+17.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 1070
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 1279
+19.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 8269
+12.5%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 7352

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.11 16.63
Recency 20 June 2016 6 August 2018
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 32 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon E5-2697A v4 has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 24.1% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, on the other hand, has a 17.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2697A v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2697A v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
Xeon E5-2697A v4
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 251 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2697A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 71 vote

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697A v4 or Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.