i7-13790F vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.02
Core i7-13790F
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
29.15
+82%

Core i7-13790F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core i7-13790F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking414150
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.2956.10
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency8.4242.44
Architecture codenameZEN+ (2018−2019)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date3 October 2018 (6 years ago)10 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649$441

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-13790F has 504% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core i7-13790F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2424
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB33 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm10 nm
Die size213 mm2257 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core i7-13790F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r21700
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core i7-13790F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core i7-13790F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core i7-13790F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core i7-13790F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core i7-13790F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 16.02
i7-13790F 29.15
+82%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25454
i7-13790F 46309
+81.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.02 29.15
Recency 3 October 2018 10 February 2023
Physical cores 12 16
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 65 Watt

i7-13790F has a 82% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 33.3% more physical cores, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 176.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-13790F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Core i7-13790F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Intel Core i7-13790F
Core i7-13790F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 73 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 58 votes

Rate Core i7-13790F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2920X or Core i7-13790F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.