i7-8670T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2900X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Core i7-8670T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| Release date | August 2018 (6 years ago) | 1 September 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Core i7-8670T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 32768 KB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 149 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Core i7-8670T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Core i7-8670T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Core i7-8670T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Core i7-8670T are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Core i7-8670T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Core i7-8670T.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 2900X has 33.3% more physical cores.
i7-8670T, on the other hand, has 257.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Core i7-8670T. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Core i7-8670T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
