Ryzen 5 5625U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1977
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1977 and Ryzen 5 5625U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 809 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 59.24 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 6 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1977 and Ryzen 5 5625U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32768 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1977 and Ryzen 5 5625U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1977 and Ryzen 5 5625U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1977 and Ryzen 5 5625U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1977 and Ryzen 5 5625U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1800 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1977 and Ryzen 5 5625U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 14 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1977 has 133.3% more physical cores.
Ryzen 5 5625U, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 933.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1977 and Ryzen 5 5625U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1977 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 5625U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1977 and Ryzen 5 5625U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
