Atom C3308 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1976X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1976X and Atom C3308 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | no data | 15 August 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $32 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1976X and Atom C3308 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 32768 KB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 89 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1976X and Atom C3308 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | SP3r2 | FCBGA1310 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 9.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1976X and Atom C3308. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 1976X and Atom C3308 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1976X and Atom C3308 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1976X and Atom C3308. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4: 1866 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 14.936 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1976X and Atom C3308.
| PCIe version | no data | 3 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
| USB revision | no data | 3 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 6 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 6 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | 4x2.5/1 GBE |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 12 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 9 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1976X has 500% more physical cores.
Atom C3308, on the other hand, has 1288.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1976X and Atom C3308. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1976X is a desktop processor while Atom C3308 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1976X and Atom C3308, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
