Iris Graphics 48 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1955

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Iris Graphics 48 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Iris Graphics
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Gen9
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Iris Graphics 48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)no data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz0.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache32768 KBno data
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Iris Graphics 48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSP3r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Iris Graphics 48 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Iris Graphics 48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory sizeno data65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Iris Graphics 48. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1955 is a desktop processor while Iris Graphics 48 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Iris Graphics 48, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1955
Ryzen Threadripper 1955
Intel Iris Graphics 48
Iris Graphics 48

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1955 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 5 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1955 or Iris Graphics 48, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.