Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1955
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Celeron 4205U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2571 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | no data | 5.42 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) |
| Release date | no data | 23 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Celeron 4205U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | OPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 18 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32768 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Celeron 4205U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | SP3r2 | Intel BGA 1528 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Celeron 4205U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Celeron 4205U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Celeron 4205U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3, DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 610 (300 - 900 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Celeron 4205U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 10 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1955 has 400% more physical cores.
Celeron 4205U, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Celeron 4205U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1955 is a desktop processor while Celeron 4205U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1955 and Celeron 4205U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
