EPYC 9575F vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking364not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.08no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency9.10no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Turin (2024)
Release date10 August 2017 (7 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999$11,791

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads32128
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size213 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors9,600 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSP3r2SP5
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and EPYC 9575F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes60128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 August 2017 10 October 2024
Physical cores 16 64
Threads 32 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 400 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 122.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9575F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9575F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
AMD EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9575F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 156 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9575F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1950X or EPYC 9575F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.