Core 2 Extreme QX6800 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 358 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.89 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.14 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Kentsfield (2007) |
| Release date | 10 August 2017 (7 years ago) | April 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 1066 MHz |
| Multiplier | 34 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 2x 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | 582 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 60 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 130 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Extreme QX6800, on the other hand, has 38.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
