Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking364not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.09no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperApple M4
Power efficiency9.10no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)no data
Release date10 August 2017 (7 years ago)30 November 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads3214
Base clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.51 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache32 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors9,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSP3r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Apple M4 Max (14 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Apple M4 Max (14 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Apple M4 32-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Apple M4 Max (14 cores).

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes60no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 August 2017 30 November 2024
Physical cores 16 14
Threads 32 14
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 80 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 14.3% more physical cores and 128.6% more threads.

Apple M4 Max (14 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 125% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Apple M4 Max (14 cores). We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a desktop processor while Apple M4 Max (14 cores) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Apple M4 Max (14 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
M4 Max (14 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 156 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (14 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1950X or Apple M4 Max (14 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.