Xeon w7-3455 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1940

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon w7-3455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated92
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data41.73
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiencyno data12.88
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date29 July 2017 (7 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,489

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon w7-3455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2848
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB67.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size213 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors9,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon w7-3455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3r2FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon w7-3455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon w7-3455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon w7-3455 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon w7-3455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon w7-3455.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2017 15 February 2023
Physical cores 14 24
Threads 28 48
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 270 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1940 has 50% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3455, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and 71.4% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon w7-3455. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1940 is a desktop processor while Xeon w7-3455 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon w7-3455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Intel Xeon w7-3455
Xeon w7-3455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1940 or Xeon w7-3455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.