Ryzen 3 1300 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1940

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Ryzen 3 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date29 July 2017 (7 years ago)11 April 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Ryzen 3 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads284
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors9,600 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Ryzen 3 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3r2AM4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Ryzen 3 1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Ryzen 3 1300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Ryzen 3 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4 Dual-channel

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2017 11 April 2017
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 28 4
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1940 has an age advantage of 3 months, and 250% more physical cores and 600% more threads.

Ryzen 3 1300, on the other hand, has 176.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Ryzen 3 1300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Ryzen 3 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Ryzen Threadripper 1940
AMD Ryzen 3 1300
Ryzen 3 1300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 41 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1940 or Ryzen 3 1300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.