Ultra 5 245K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1940

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core Ultra 5 245K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data78.36
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data20.82
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date29 July 2017 (7 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core Ultra 5 245K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads2814
Base clock speed3.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rateno data159 MHz
L1 cache96K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size213 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors9,600 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core Ultra 5 245K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3r21851
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core Ultra 5 245K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core Ultra 5 245K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core Ultra 5 245K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core Ultra 5 245K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core Ultra 5 245K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2017 24 October 2024
Threads 28 14
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1940 has 100% more threads.

Ultra 5 245K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 44% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core Ultra 5 245K. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Core Ultra 5 245K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Core Ultra 5 245K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 21 vote

Rate Core Ultra 5 245K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1940 or Core Ultra 5 245K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.