Athlon 64 2850e vs Ryzen Threadripper 1930X

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Athlon 64 2850e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Lima (2008−2009)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Athlon 64 2850e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threadsno data1
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128K
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K
L3 cache32768 KBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data77 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistorsno data122 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Athlon 64 2850e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3r2AM2
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt22 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Athlon 64 2850e are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Athlon 64 2850e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR2

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 12 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 22 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1930X has 1100% more physical cores, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 2850e, on the other hand, has 468.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Athlon 64 2850e. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Athlon 64 2850e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1930X
Ryzen Threadripper 1930X
AMD Athlon 64 2850e
Athlon 64 2850e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1930X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate Athlon 64 2850e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1930X or Athlon 64 2850e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.