Xeon Max 9480 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
15.08
Xeon Max 9480
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
57.12
+279%

Xeon Max 9480 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X by a whopping 279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon Max 9480 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking48823
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.690.03
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency7.6414.88
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023)
Release date13 July 2017 (7 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799$12,980

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 15533% better value for money than Xeon Max 9480.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon Max 9480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads24112
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache1.125 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB112.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size213 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data64 °C
Number of transistors9600 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon Max 9480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSP3r24677
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon Max 9480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon Max 9480 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon Max 9480 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon Max 9480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon Max 9480.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes6080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 15.08
Xeon Max 9480 57.12
+279%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 23084
Xeon Max 9480 87420
+279%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.08 57.12
Recency 13 July 2017 10 January 2023
Physical cores 12 56
Threads 24 112
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 350 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 94.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Max 9480, on the other hand, has a 278.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 366.7% more physical cores and 366.7% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Max 9480 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a desktop processor while Xeon Max 9480 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon Max 9480, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Intel Xeon Max 9480
Xeon Max 9480

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 381 vote

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 12 votes

Rate Xeon Max 9480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1920X or Xeon Max 9480, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.