Xeon E5 1680 v4 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
14.81
+62.4%
Xeon E5 1680 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
9.12

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E5 1680 v4 by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon E5-1680 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking491856
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.391.92
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency7.646.05
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Broadwell-EP (2016)
Release date13 July 2017 (7 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799$1,723

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 129% better value for money than Xeon E5 1680 v4.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon E5-1680 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier3534
L1 cache1.125 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB2 MB
L3 cache32 MB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2246.24 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors9600 Million3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon E5-1680 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3r2FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon E5-1680 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon E5-1680 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon E5-1680 v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon E5-1680 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size2 TiB1.5 TB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon E5-1680 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6040

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.81 9.12
Recency 13 July 2017 20 June 2016
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 140 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a 62.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Xeon E5 1680 v4, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5 1680 v4 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5 1680 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Xeon E5 1680 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Xeon E5 1680 v4
Xeon E5 1680 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 382 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 67 votes

Rate Xeon E5 1680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1920X or Xeon E5 1680 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.