Celeron 2950M vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
15.08
+1762%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Celeron 2950M by a whopping 1762% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Celeron 2950M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4892621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.48no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Celeron
Power efficiency7.642.00
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date13 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Celeron 2950M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache1.125 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size213 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors9600 Million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Celeron 2950M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r2FCPGA946
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Celeron 2950M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Celeron 2950M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Celeron 2950M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Celeron 2950M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequency-1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Celeron 2950M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
VGA-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Celeron 2950M.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes6016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 15.08
+1762%
Celeron 2950M 0.81

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 23084
+1771%
Celeron 2950M 1234

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.08 0.81
Recency 13 July 2017 1 September 2013
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 37 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a 1761.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 2950M, on the other hand, has 386.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 2950M in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a desktop processor while Celeron 2950M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Celeron 2950M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Intel Celeron 2950M
Celeron 2950M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 382 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 12 votes

Rate Celeron 2950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1920X or Celeron 2950M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.