Ryzen 5 8640U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 140 Watt
13.89
+5.2%
Ryzen 5 8640U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
13.20

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 outperforms Ryzen 5 8640U by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Ryzen 5 8640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking529565
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency9.3944.61
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date29 July 2017 (7 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Ryzen 5 8640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size213 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors9,600 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Ryzen 5 8640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3r2FP8
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Ryzen 5 8640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Ryzen 5 8640U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Ryzen 5 8640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Ryzen 5 8640U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 13.89
+5.2%
Ryzen 5 8640U 13.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 22066
+5.2%
Ryzen 5 8640U 20971

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.89 13.20
Recency 29 July 2017 6 December 2023
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a 5.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 5 8640U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Ryzen 5 8640U.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 8640U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Ryzen 5 8640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
Ryzen 5 8640U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 22 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 8640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1920 or Ryzen 5 8640U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.