Celeron 6205 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 529 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Tiger Lake |
| Power efficiency | 9.39 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Tiger Lake U (2020) |
| Release date | 29 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2/2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | SP3r2 | BGA1499 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 July 2017 | 1 September 2020 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 2 |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 833.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is a desktop processor while Celeron 6205 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
