Xeon Silver 4210 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
10.98
+24.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon Silver 4210 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Silver 4210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking728882
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.0419.82
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency5.569.47
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date30 July 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549$501

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4210 has 391% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Silver 4210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3822
L1 cache768 KB640 KB
L2 cache4 MB10 MB
L3 cache16 MB13.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
Number of transistors9600 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Silver 4210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSP3r2FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Silver 4210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Silver 4210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Silver 4210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Silver 4210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size2 TiB1 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Silver 4210.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 10.98
+24.3%
Xeon Silver 4210 8.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 16809
+24.3%
Xeon Silver 4210 13520

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 1188
+23.9%
Xeon Silver 4210 959

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 5884
+5.8%
Xeon Silver 4210 5561

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.98 8.83
Recency 30 July 2017 2 April 2019
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 16 20
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 85 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has a 24.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon Silver 4210, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and 111.8% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4210 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4210 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Silver 4210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Intel Xeon Silver 4210
Xeon Silver 4210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 125 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 46 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1900X or Xeon Silver 4210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.