Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
10.58
+11.3%
Core Ultra 7 164U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 9 Watt
9.51

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core Ultra 7 164U by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core Ultra 7 164U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking730797
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.73no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency5.56100.00
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Meteor Lake-U (2023)
Release date30 July 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549$448

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core Ultra 7 164U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1614
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache768 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
Number of transistors9600 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core Ultra 7 164U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r2FCBGA2551
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core Ultra 7 164U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core Ultra 7 164U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core Ultra 7 164U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core Ultra 7 164U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency-1.8 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP-3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12.2
OpenGL-4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core Ultra 7 164U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes608
PCI supportno data4.0 and 3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 10.58
+11.3%
Ultra 7 164U 9.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 16809
+11.3%
Ultra 7 164U 15106

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.58 9.51
Recency 30 July 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 14
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 9 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has a 11.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 14.3% more threads.

Ultra 7 164U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 50% more physical cores, and 1900% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 164U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 164U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Core Ultra 7 164U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Core Ultra 7 164U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 125 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 164U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1900X or Core Ultra 7 164U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.