Celeron 3765U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
10.98
+1239%

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Celeron 3765U by a whopping 1239% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron 3765U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7282610
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.85no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Celeron
Power efficiency5.564.98
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date30 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron 3765U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache768 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB512 KB
L3 cache16 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors9600 Million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron 3765U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r2FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron 3765U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron 3765U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron 3765U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron 3765U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiB16 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video-+
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency-850 MHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron 3765U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron 3765U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-11.2/12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron 3765U.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes6012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 10.98
+1239%
Celeron 3765U 0.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 16809
+1243%
Celeron 3765U 1252

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.98 0.82
Recency 30 July 2017 1 June 2015
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has a 1239% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron 3765U, on the other hand, has 1100% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3765U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a desktop processor while Celeron 3765U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron 3765U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 125 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1900X or Celeron 3765U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.