Ryzen 7 3700X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Ryzen 7 3700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated508
Place by popularitynot in top-10073
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.05
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiencyno data20.65
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date31 August 2017 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Ryzen 7 3700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache32 MB32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors9,600 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Ryzen 7 3700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3r2AM4
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Ryzen 7 3700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Ryzen 7 3700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Ryzen 7 3700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 August 2017 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 3700X has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Ryzen 7 3700X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Ryzen 7 3700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900
Ryzen Threadripper 1900
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 5 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5322 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1900 or Ryzen 7 3700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.