Ryzen 3 8300G vs Ryzen Embedded V2516

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded V2516
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
8.19
Ryzen 3 8300G
2024
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
9.01
+10%

Ryzen 3 8300G outperforms Ryzen Embedded V2516 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking928854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.47
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Embeddedno data
Power efficiency77.5113.12
Architecture codenameRenoir (2020−2023)Phoenix2 (2024)
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$176

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.9 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size156 mm2137 mm2
Number of transistors9,800 million20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.269 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SPAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Ryzen 3 8300G.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes2014

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Embedded V2516 8.19
Ryzen 3 8300G 9.01
+10%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded V2516 13016
Ryzen 3 8300G 14316
+10%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.19 9.01
Recency 10 November 2020 8 January 2024
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V2516 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 8300G, on the other hand, has a 10% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 8300G is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded V2516 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516
Ryzen Embedded V2516
AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded V2516 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Embedded V2516 or Ryzen 3 8300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.