Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded V1605B
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.28
Ryzen 9 3900XT
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
20.96
+390%

Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Ryzen Embedded V1605B by a whopping 390% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900XT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1375268
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data24.86
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen EmbeddedAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency26.5018.54
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Matisse 2 (2020)
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)16 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900XT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads824
Base clock speed2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.7 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache384 KB768 KB
L2 cache2 MB6 MB
L3 cache4 MB64 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size209.78 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900XT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900XT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900XT are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900XT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900XT.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 4.28
Ryzen 9 3900XT 20.96
+390%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 6677
Ryzen 9 3900XT 32666
+389%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.28 20.96
Recency 21 February 2018 16 June 2020
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 8 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 105 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V1605B has 600% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 3900XT, on the other hand, has a 389.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 3900XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded V1605B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Ryzen 9 3900XT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Ryzen 9 3900XT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate Ryzen Embedded V1605B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 416 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Embedded V1605B or Ryzen 9 3900XT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.