EPYC 8434PN vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC 8434PN processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 291 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 34.31 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 25 July 2024 (less than a year ago) | 18 September 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,150 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC 8434PN basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 35,500 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC 8434PN compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC 8434PN. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC 8434PN are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC 8434PN. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC 8434PN.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 July 2024 | 18 September 2023 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 48 |
| Threads | 24 | 96 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 155 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has an age advantage of 10 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 187% lower power consumption.
EPYC 8434PN, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC 8434PN. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while EPYC 8434PN is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and EPYC 8434PN, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
