i7-860S vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
21.46
+1340%

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Core i7-860S by a whopping 1340% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-860S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2592174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)no data
Power efficiency36.241.66
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$422

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-860S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2 GHz2.53 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.46 GHz
Bus rateno data2.5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data296 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-860S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP8FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt82 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-860S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-860S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-860S are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-860S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890Mno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-860S.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 21.46
+1340%
i7-860S 1.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 32843
+1340%
i7-860S 2280

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.46 1.49
Recency 25 July 2024 7 January 2010
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 4 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 82 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 1340.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 51.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-860S in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while Core i7-860S is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i7-860S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Intel Core i7-860S
Core i7-860S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 20 votes

Rate Core i7-860S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Core i7-860S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.