i3-N300 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.68
+268%
Core i3-N300
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 7 Watt
5.35

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Core i3-N300 by a whopping 268% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i3-N300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2911178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)no data
Power efficiency34.4972.33
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i3-N300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB2 MB (per module)
L3 cache24 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i3-N300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP8FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i3-N300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
GPIOno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i3-N300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i3-N300 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i3-N300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i3-N300.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.68
+268%
i3-N300 5.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 31255
+268%
i3-N300 8497

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 3334
+701%
i3-N300 416

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 301
+254%
i3-N300 85

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 14728
+451%
i3-N300 2674

Blender(-)

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 159
i3-N300 1095
+589%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 2121
+239%
i3-N300 626

7-Zip Single

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 5856
+144%
i3-N300 2403

7-Zip

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 77867
+550%
i3-N300 11976

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 348
+234%
i3-N300 104

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 1720
+225%
i3-N300 529

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 241
i3-N300 2147
+791%

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 15220
+443%
i3-N300 2803

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 2867
+276%
i3-N300 762

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.68 5.35
Integrated graphics card 21.88 5.58
Recency 25 July 2024 3 January 2023
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 8
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 7 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 267.9% higher aggregate performance score, 292.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

i3-N300, on the other hand, has 671.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-N300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core i3-N300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Intel Core i3-N300
Core i3-N300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 78 votes

Rate Core i3-N300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Core i3-N300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.