Celeron J4025 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Celeron J4025 by a whopping 2016% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron J4025 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 291 | 2526 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.67 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 34.47 | 8.80 |
| Architecture codename | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) |
| Release date | 25 July 2024 (less than a year ago) | 4 November 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron J4025 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 93 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron J4025 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | Intel BGA 1090 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron J4025. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron J4025 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron J4025. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron J4025.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
Blender(-)
Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core
7-Zip Single
7-Zip
WebXPRT 3
CrossMark Overall
WebXPRT 4 Overall
Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.68 | 0.93 |
| Integrated graphics card | 21.89 | 0.87 |
| Recency | 25 July 2024 | 4 November 2019 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 2 |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 10 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 2016.1% higher aggregate performance score, 2416.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron J4025, on the other hand, has 440% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while Celeron J4025 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron J4025, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
