Celeron 6305 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.68
+1402%
Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.31

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Celeron 6305 by a whopping 1402% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 6305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2912275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)Intel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency34.478.26
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Tiger Lake-U (2020)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 6305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cache12 MB2.5 MB
L3 cache24 MB4 MB
Chip lithography4 nm10 nm SuperFin
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 6305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP8FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 6305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 6305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 6305 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 6305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.68
+1402%
Celeron 6305 1.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 31255
+1403%
Celeron 6305 2080

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 3334
+1970%
Celeron 6305 161

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 301
+259%
Celeron 6305 84

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 14728
+1129%
Celeron 6305 1198

Blender(-)

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 159
Celeron 6305 2834
+1682%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 2121
+232%
Celeron 6305 638

7-Zip Single

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 5856
+162%
Celeron 6305 2238

7-Zip

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 77867
+1727%
Celeron 6305 4263

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 348
+246%
Celeron 6305 101

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 1720
+239%
Celeron 6305 508

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.68 1.31
Integrated graphics card 21.89 5.58
Recency 25 July 2024 1 September 2020
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 1402.3% higher aggregate performance score, 292.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 6305, on the other hand, has 260% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 6305 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 6305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 153 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Celeron 6305, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.