Athlon 1000 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Athlon 1000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking288not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)no data
Power efficiency34.07no data
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Thunderbird C (2000−2001)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)6 March 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,299

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Athlon 1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads241
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz1 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache12 MB512 KB
L3 cache24 MB0 KB
Chip lithography4 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data102 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistorsno data22 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Athlon 1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP8A
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Athlon 1000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Athlon 1000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890MN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2024 6 March 2000
Physical cores 12 1
Threads 24 1
Chip lithography 4 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has an age advantage of 24 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, a 4400% more advanced lithography process, and 20.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Athlon 1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while Athlon 1000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Athlon 1000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
AMD Athlon 1000
Athlon 1000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 35 votes

Rate Athlon 1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Athlon 1000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.