Ryzen Threadripper 1940X vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 231 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 75.64 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Strix Point (2024) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | July 2024 (recently) | 29 July 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 28 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 54 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 Quad-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 890M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 12 | 14 |
| Threads | 24 | 28 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 180 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 542.9% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, on the other hand, has 16.7% more physical cores and 16.7% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1940X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
