Celeron N4500 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 28 Watt
22.74
+1691%
Celeron N4500
2021
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.27

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 outperforms Celeron N4500 by a whopping 1691% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron N4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2322300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency75.4319.66
Architecture codenameStrix Point (2024)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release dateJuly 2024 (recently)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron N4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate54 MHzno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography4 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron N4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP8FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron N4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron N4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron N4500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron N4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 890MIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron N4500.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes168
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 22.74
+1691%
Celeron N4500 1.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 35448
+1698%
Celeron N4500 1972

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 16380
+698%
Celeron N4500 2053

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 3410
+1894%
Celeron N4500 171

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 305
+271%
Celeron N4500 82

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 14562
+1330%
Celeron N4500 1018

Blender(-)

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 147
Celeron N4500 4249
+2790%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 2072
+249%
Celeron N4500 594

7-Zip Single

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 6117
+114%
Celeron N4500 2853

7-Zip

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 81370
+1409%
Celeron N4500 5394

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 293
+209%
Celeron N4500 95

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.74 1.27
Integrated graphics card 21.70 5.57
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a 1690.6% higher aggregate performance score, 289.6% faster integrated GPU, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N4500, on the other hand, has 366.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron N4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Intel Celeron N4500
Celeron N4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 83 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 711 votes

Rate Celeron N4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 or Celeron N4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.