Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking349not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Apple M4
Power efficiency47.77no data
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)no data
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)30 November 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1614
Base clock speed4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.51 GHz
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache8 MBno data
L3 cache16 MBno data
Chip lithography4 nm3 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Apple M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7/FP8no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)Apple M4 32-core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 June 2023 30 November 2024
Physical cores 8 14
Threads 16 14
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS has 14.3% more threads, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

Apple M4 Max (14 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 75% more physical cores, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Apple M4 Max (14 cores). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Apple M4 Max (14 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
M4 Max (14 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 47 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (14 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS or Apple M4 Max (14 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.