Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.34
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.27
+27.4%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking502327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency38.6149.19
Architecture codenameRembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date19 April 2022 (2 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm4 nm
Die size208 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP7FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMERyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 680MAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 14.34
Ryzen 7 7840HS 18.27
+27.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 22697
Ryzen 7 7840HS 28915
+27.4%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 1894
Ryzen 7 7840HS 2367
+25%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 8673
Ryzen 7 7840HS 11007
+26.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 6266
Ryzen 7 7840HS 7642
+22%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 36583
Ryzen 7 7840HS 47933
+31%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 8.4
Ryzen 7 7840HS 2.64
+218%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 22
Ryzen 7 7840HS 30
+35.5%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 1913
Ryzen 7 7840HS 2573
+34.5%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 239
Ryzen 7 7840HS 279
+16.5%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 2.82
Ryzen 7 7840HS 3.31
+17.4%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 11.7
Ryzen 7 7840HS 14.8
+26.5%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 103
Ryzen 7 7840HS 147
+42.4%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 222
Ryzen 7 7840HS 290
+30.5%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 5970
Ryzen 7 7840HS 7064
+18.3%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 7664
Ryzen 7 7840HS 11874
+54.9%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 264
+34.7%
Ryzen 7 7840HS 196

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 1549
Ryzen 7 7840HS 1964
+26.8%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 5516
Ryzen 7 7840HS 6618
+20%

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 49474
Ryzen 7 7840HS 70330
+42.2%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 274
Ryzen 7 7840HS 321
+17.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.34 18.27
Integrated graphics card 15.98 18.30
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm

Ryzen 7 7840HS has a 27.4% higher aggregate performance score, 14.5% faster integrated GPU, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1629 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS or Ryzen 7 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.