Xeon Gold 6426Y vs Ryzen 9 7950X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 7950X
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.62
+64.3%
Xeon Gold 6426Y
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 185 Watt
24.11

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon Gold 6426Y by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 7950X and Xeon Gold 6426Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking66207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.17
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency21.9612.28
Architecture codenameRaphael (Zen 4) (2022)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,517

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 7950X and Xeon Gold 6426Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed4.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)37.5 MB
Chip lithography5 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeCCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)47 °C80 °C
Number of transistors13140 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 7950X and Xeon Gold 6426Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM5FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7950X and Xeon Gold 6426Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 VIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 7950X and Xeon Gold 6426Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7950X and Xeon Gold 6426Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7950X and Xeon Gold 6426Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7950X and Xeon Gold 6426Y.

PCIe version5.05
PCI Express lanes2480

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 7950X 39.62
+64.3%
Xeon Gold 6426Y 24.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 7950X 62702
+64.3%
Xeon Gold 6426Y 38159

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.62 24.11
Recency 27 September 2022 10 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 185 Watt

Ryzen 9 7950X has a 64.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 8.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6426Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.

The Ryzen 9 7950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6426Y in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 7950X is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6426Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7950X and Xeon Gold 6426Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X
Intel Xeon Gold 6426Y
Xeon Gold 6426Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1602 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6426Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 7950X or Xeon Gold 6426Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.