Ryzen 7 8700GE vs Ryzen 9 7940HX
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 7940HX and Ryzen 7 8700GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 113 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 58.18 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 17 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 7940HX and Ryzen 7 8700GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 1 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9900 Million | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 7940HX and Ryzen 7 8700GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FL1 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Ryzen 7 8700GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Ryzen 7 8700GE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Ryzen 7 8700GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 610M | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and Ryzen 7 8700GE.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 2.85 | 18.29 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 9 7940HX has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen 7 8700GE, on the other hand, has 541.8% faster integrated GPU, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 57.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 9 7940HX and Ryzen 7 8700GE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 9 7940HX is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 8700GE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7940HX and Ryzen 7 8700GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
