Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Ryzen 9 7900X
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 7900X and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 123 | 180 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Apple M4 |
| Power efficiency | 18.01 | 63.95 |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | no data |
| Release date | 27 September 2022 (2 years ago) | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 7900X and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 4.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.6 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 2x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | CCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 7900X and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 40 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7900X and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 5 nm (CCD), 6 nm (I/O) nm, 0.650 - 1.475V | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7900X and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7900X and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-5200 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Apple M4 20-core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7900X and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores).
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
CrossMark Overall
WebXPRT 4 Overall
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 32.52 | 27.17 |
| Recency | 27 September 2022 | 30 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 14 |
| Threads | 24 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 40 Watt |
Ryzen 9 7900X has a 19.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 71.4% more threads.
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 16.7% more physical cores, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 325% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 9 7900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7900X and Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
