Apple M4 (10 cores) vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Apple M4 (10 cores) by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 5900X and Apple M4 (10 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 205 | 238 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 32.37 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 9 | Apple Apple M4 |
| Power efficiency | 22.07 | 52.06 |
| Architecture codename | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | no data |
| Release date | 5 November 2020 (4 years ago) | 7 May 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 5900X and Apple M4 (10 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 37 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 2x 74 mm2(CCD) + 125 mm2 (IOD) | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 0 Million | 28 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 5900X and Apple M4 (10 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 40 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and Apple M4 (10 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and Apple M4 (10 cores) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and Apple M4 (10 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Apple M4 10-core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and Apple M4 (10 cores).
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
CrossMark Overall
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 24.62 | 22.12 |
| Recency | 5 November 2020 | 7 May 2024 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 10 |
| Threads | 24 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 40 Watt |
Ryzen 9 5900X has a 11.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 20% more physical cores and 140% more threads.
Apple M4 (10 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 162.5% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 9 5900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 (10 cores) in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900X and Apple M4 (10 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
