Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U vs Ryzen 9 5900HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5900HS
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
13.61
+13.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
11.97

Ryzen 9 5900HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking549649
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)no data
Power efficiency36.6175.13
Architecture codenameCezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)Barcelo-U Refresh (2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.5 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die size180 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors10,700 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 13.61
+13.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 11.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 21620
+13.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 19014

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 6380
+4.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 6108

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 41235
+22.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 33735

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 25
+42.1%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 18

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 2041
+16.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1756

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 237
+3.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 229

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 2.83
+5.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 2.68

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 5900HS 7867
+19.9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 6560

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 5900HS 241
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 302
+25.1%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 5900HS 1497
+4.1%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1438

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 5900HS 5653
+7.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 5269

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 5900HS 57286
+24.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 45924

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 5900HS 276
+8.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 254

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 9 5900HS 1414
+17.1%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1207

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.61 11.97
Recency 12 January 2021 4 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 9 5900HS has a 13.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 5900HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
Ryzen 9 5900HS
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 177 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5900HS or Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.