A10-7800 vs Ryzen 9 5900HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5900HS
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
13.60
+573%
A10-7800
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.02

Ryzen 9 5900HS outperforms A10-7800 by a whopping 573% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5900HS and A10-7800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5531925
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)no data
Power efficiency36.772.94
Architecture codenameCezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)31 July 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5900HS and A10-7800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache512 KB256 KB
L2 cache4 MB4096 KB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm28 nm
Die size180 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors10,700 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5900HS and A10-7800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and A10-7800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and A10-7800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and A10-7800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data512
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 9 5900HS and A10-7800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and A10-7800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and A10-7800.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 13.60
+573%
A10-7800 2.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 21607
+573%
A10-7800 3210

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.60 2.02
Recency 12 January 2021 31 July 2014
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 9 5900HS has a 573.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 5900HS is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 9 5900HS is a notebook processor while A10-7800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900HS and A10-7800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
Ryzen 9 5900HS
AMD A10-7800
A10-7800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 177 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 305 votes

Rate A10-7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5900HS or A10-7800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.