Xeon E7-4880 v3 vs Ryzen 9 5900
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E7-4880 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 242 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 9 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 31.54 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Vermeer (2020−2024) | Haswell-EX (2015) |
| Release date | 12 January 2021 (3 years ago) | 1 June 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E7-4880 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 36 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 45 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | 160 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,150 million | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E7-4880 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 4 |
| Socket | AM4 | 1150 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 140 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E7-4880 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E7-4880 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E7-4880 v3 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E7-4880 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR3, DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E7-4880 v3.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 January 2021 | 1 June 2015 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 18 |
| Threads | 24 | 36 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 140 Watt |
Ryzen 9 5900 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 214.3% more advanced lithography process, and 115.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon E7-4880 v3, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E7-4880 v3. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 9 5900 is a desktop processor while Xeon E7-4880 v3 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900 and Xeon E7-4880 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
