Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H vs Ryzen 9 4900H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 4900H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
12.06
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
14.71
+22%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H outperforms Ryzen 9 4900H by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking644484
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency21.1430.94
Architecture codenameRenoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date16 March 2020 (4 years ago)19 April 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.7 GHz
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm6 nm
Die size156 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistors9800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FP7
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHAPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 4900H 12.06
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 14.71
+22%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 4900H 19149
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 23361
+22%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 4900H 1550
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 1816
+17.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 4900H 6733
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 8483
+26%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 9 4900H 5946
+2.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 5791

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 9 4900H 40253
+17%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 34412

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 9 4900H 3.19
+16.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 3.72

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 9 4900H 23
+8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 21

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 4900H 1927
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 2086
+8.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 4900H 193
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 205
+6.3%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 4900H 2.24
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 2.6
+16.1%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 9 4900H 7.4
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 9.1
+23%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 9 4900H 4297
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 5263
+22.5%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 9 4900H 111
+6.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 104

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 9 4900H 215
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 222
+3.5%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 4900H 8012
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 8472
+5.7%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 9 4900H 247
+2.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 242

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 4900H 1232
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 1478
+20%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 9 4900H 4727
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 5417
+14.6%

7-Zip

Ryzen 9 4900H 48976
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 54445
+11.2%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 4900H 227
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H 232
+2.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.06 14.71
Integrated graphics card 9.05 15.33
Recency 16 March 2020 19 April 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm

Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H has a 22% higher aggregate performance score, 69.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 4900H in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
Ryzen 9 4900H
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 241 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 4900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 14 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 4900H or Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.