Ultra 7 265F vs Ryzen 9 4900H

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 4900H and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking635not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency21.14no data
Architecture codenameRenoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date16 March 2020 (4 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 4900H and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache128K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm3 nm
Die size156 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors9800 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 4900H and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP61851
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 4900H and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 4900H and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 4900H and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 4900H and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 4900H and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 20
Threads 16 20
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 9 4900H has 20.4% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265F, on the other hand, has 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 9 4900H and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 9 4900H is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 4900H and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
Ryzen 9 4900H
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 241 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 4900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 4900H or Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.