EPYC 9474F vs Ryzen 9 3950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3950X
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
25.32
EPYC 9474F
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 360 Watt
68.62
+171%

EPYC 9474F outperforms Ryzen 9 3950X by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 9474F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20310
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.095.26
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9AMD EPYC
Power efficiency21.9917.38
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date11 June 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799$6,780

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3950X has 225% better value for money than EPYC 9474F.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 9474F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads3296
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache1 MB3 MB
L2 cache8 MB48 MB
L3 cache64 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size2 x 72 mm + 125 mm (IO-Die) mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors19,200 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 9474F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 9474F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 9474F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 9474F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 9474F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3950X 25.32
EPYC 9474F 68.62
+171%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3950X 38750
EPYC 9474F 105010
+171%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.32 68.62
Recency 11 June 2019 10 November 2022
Physical cores 16 48
Threads 32 96
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 360 Watt

Ryzen 9 3950X has 242.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9474F, on the other hand, has a 171% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9474F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 3950X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3950X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9474F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3950X and EPYC 9474F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X
AMD EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9474F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 711 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 9474F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3950X or EPYC 9474F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.